Skip to main content

Loup Ventures LiDAR Technologies Comparison

Loup Ventures publishes its analysis of LiDAR technologies and how they compete with each other on the market:


There is also a comparison of camera, LiDAR and Radar technologies of autonomous vehicles:


Another Loup Ventures article tries to answer on question "If a human can drive a car based on vision alone, why can’t a computer?"

"While we believe Tesla can develop autonomous cars that “resemble human driving” primarily driven by cameras, the goal is to create a system that far exceeds human capability. For that reason, we believe more data is better, and cars will need advanced computer perception technologies such as RADAR and LiDAR to achieve a level of driving far superior than humans. However, since cameras are the only sensor technology that can capture texture, color and contrast information, they will play a key role in reaching level 4 and 5 autonomy and in-turn represent a large market opportunity."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SMAMDA Festival Videographer

SMAMDA Fest Videographer 2016 #increiblesf2016 - Smamda Fest Videographer 2016. Mungkin banyak dari kalian sudah sering mendengar mengenai Smamda Fest. Apa sih Smamda Fest itu? kok banyak yang promosi tentang Smamda Fest? Pertanyaan-pertanyaan berikut akan saya bahas pada artikel ini. SMAMDA Festival adalah sebuah acara yang diadakan oleh SMA Muhammadiyah 2 Sidoarjo. Pada acara tersebut

Zoom - Home Edition 1.3.0.0 | Perpustakaan Slide - semua slide Anda dalam satu tempat untuk memilih, menciptakan, cetak, email

Zoom - Perpustakaan Slide adalah kecil, sederhana, mudah untuk menggunakan alat organisasi yang dirancang khusus untuk presentasi PowerPoint. Zoom memberikan gambaran lengkap dari seluruh perpustakaan slide PPT.  Anda dapat memilih, cetak, email, atau pdf slide yang ada dan presentasi. Anda dapat bekerja di beberapa slide presentasi dengan PowerPoint tanpa menyentuh sama sekali. Anda dapat

e2v on CCD vs CMOS Sensors

AZO Materials publishes Teledyne e2v article " The Development of CMOS Image Sensors " with a table comparing CCD and CMOS sensors. Although I do not agree with some of the statements in the table, here it is: Characteristic CCD CMOS Signal from pixel Electron packet Voltage Signal from chip Analog Voltage Bits (digital) Readout noise low Lower at equivalent frame rate Fill factor High Moderate or low Photo-Response Moderate to high Moderate to high Sensitivity High Higher Dynamic Range High Moderate to high Uniformity High Slightly Lower Power consumption Moderate to high Low to moderate Shuttering Fast, efficient Fast, efficient Speed Moderate to High Higher Windowing Limited Multiple Anti-blooming High to none High, always Image Artefact Smearing, charge transfer inefficiency FPN, Motion (ERS), PLS Biasing and Clocking Multiple, higher voltage Single, low-voltage System Complexity High Low Sensor Complexity Low High Relative R&D cost Lower Lower or Higher depending on ...